Search for: All records

Improved water management is a growing need in areas where rice production is intensive. In the state of Arkansas and other portions of the US, new irrigation practices are being implemented to conserve water during rice cultivation. The goal of this study was to evaluate canopy water use in two commercial rice fields using different irrigation practices across three growing seasons. Canopy water use was assessed across multiple metrics, including different representations of water use efficiency (WUE) as well as their contributing terms, gross primary production (GPP) and evapotranspiration (ET). Furthermore, we validated and employed a methodology for estimating transpiration from ET using the concept of underlying water use efficiency (uWUE) that includes a sensitivity to vapor pressure deficit (VPD). Periodic drying associated with the alternate wetting and drying irrigation practice did not result in decreased GPP, ET, or transpiration (T). Our findings indicated that approximately 43 to 56 % of ET is released as T during the growing season. The uWUE method improved the relationship between GPP and ET by accounting for the limitation of VPD on GPP during the afternoon periods. 

Abstract Rice is an important global crop while also contributing significant anthropogenic methane (CH₄) emissions. To support the future of rice production, more information is needed on the impacts of sustainability-driven management used to grow rice with lower associated methane emissions. Recent support for the impacts of different growing practices in the US has prompted the application of a regional methodology (Tier 2) to estimate methane emissions in different rice growing regions. The methodology estimates rice methane emissions from the US Mid-South (MdS) and California (Cal) using region-specific scaling factors applied to a region-specific baseline flux. In our study, we leverage land cover data and soil clay content to estimate methane emissions using this approach, while also examining how changes in common production practices can affect overall emissions in the US. Our results indicated US rice cultivation produced between 0.32 and 0.45 Tg CH₄annually, which were approximately 7% and 42% lower on average compared to Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN (FAO) and US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) inventories, respectively. Our estimates were 63% greater on average compared to similar methods that lack regional context. Introducing aeration events into irrigation resulted in the greatest methane reductions across both regions. When accounting for differences between baseline and reduction scenarios, the US MdS typically had higher mitigation potential compared to Cal. The differences in cumulative mitigation potential across the 2008–2020 period were likely driven by lower production area clay content for the US MdS compared to Cal. The added spatial representation in the Tier 2 approach is useful in surveying how impactful methane-reducing practices might be within and across regions.